Audi A6 2.0 TDI
Sedan · Diesel · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz G 350 d
Sedan · Diesel · FWD
Audi A6 2.0 TDI
Car A
Audi A6 2.0 TDI
The Audi A6 2.0 TDI combines diesel efficiency with AWD traction to suit road trips and all-weather family duty. It favors relaxed, economical cruising over outright speed or city-first use.
5 seatsSedanDiesel5-star safety4.9 L/100kmAWD
Mercedes-Benz G 350 d
Car B
Mercedes-Benz G 350 d
The Mercedes-Benz G 350 d focuses on road-trip comfort and power, combining a 286 hp diesel and 600 Nm with a capacious 890 L cargo area. Premium pricing and front-wheel drive make it less compelling for city-first drivers or those wanting AWD traction.
5 seatsSedanDiesel5-star safety286 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 64 / 67
City 39 / 24
Budget / value 57 / 13
Road trip 68 / 77
Performance 39 / 32
Cargo 29 / 50
Practical 48 / 39
Premium 56 / 70
Winter 70 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi A6 2.0 TDI · Orange = Mercedes-Benz G 350 d

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi A6 2.0 TDI Mercedes-Benz G 350 d
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi A6 2.0 TDI

  • Efficient for its class at 4.9 L/100 km, ideal for long-distance driving
  • AWD enhances stability and confidence in winter and mixed conditions
  • Five seats and a 530 L trunk handle family luggage for trips
  • Good value in its segment considering efficiency and all-weather capability

Mercedes-Benz G 350 d

  • Strong diesel torque (600 Nm) for confident overtakes when fully loaded
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 6.4 s aids easy highway merging
  • Large 890 L trunk fits road-trip luggage and family gear
  • Premium positioning aligns with comfort-focused travel

Verdict

Pick Audi A6 2.0 TDI if…
Best fuel economy
Audi A6 2.0 TDI uses 4.9 L/100km vs 9.2 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz G 350 d if…
More power
Mercedes-Benz G 350 d puts out 286 hp vs 163 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons