Audi A6 2.0 TFSI
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz C 300
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Audi A6 2.0 TFSI
Car A
Audi A6 2.0 TFSI
An AWD five-seater with a 530 L trunk and 6 L/100 km economy, the A6 2.0 TFSI suits road trips and growing families while emphasizing reliability and safety. Performance is brisk enough at 0–100 km/h in 6.7 s, though it doesn’t target thrill-seekers.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km190 hpAWD
Mercedes-Benz C 300
Car B
Mercedes-Benz C 300
The Mercedes-Benz C 300 blends everyday usability with confident acceleration and efficient cruising for families and road trips. Five seats, a 455-liter trunk, 5.9 s 0–100 km/h, and 6.5 L/100 km combined consumption add up to good value in its segment.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 65 / 62
City 37 / 50
Budget / value 56 / 61
Road trip 68 / 53
Performance 38 / 26
Cargo 29 / 25
Practical 48 / 45
Premium 57 / 46
Winter 70 / 26

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi A6 2.0 TFSI · Orange = Mercedes-Benz C 300

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi A6 2.0 TFSI Mercedes-Benz C 300
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi A6 2.0 TFSI

  • AWD traction adds confidence for winter and mixed road conditions
  • Room for five and a 530 L trunk make it road‑trip ready for families
  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km
  • Good value in its segment at around 55,000

Mercedes-Benz C 300

  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.9 s makes highway merging and passing easy
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km to help manage running costs
  • 455-liter trunk and five seats suit growing families and weekend travel
  • FWD layout offers predictable, straightforward daily driving

Verdict

Pick Audi A6 2.0 TFSI if…
Best fuel economy
Audi A6 2.0 TFSI uses 6.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz C 300 if…
Performance & capability
Mercedes-Benz C 300 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons