Audi A6 4.0 TDI
Sedan · Diesel · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
Sedan · Electric · AWD
Audi A6 4.0 TDI
Car A
Audi A6 4.0 TDI
A quick, long-range AWD V8 diesel aimed at premium buyers, pairing 4.4 s 0–100 km/h pace with an efficient 7 L/100 km. Seats five with a 530-liter trunk, making it ideal for road trips while being less compelling for city-first use.
5 seatsSedanDiesel5-star safetyAWD
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
Car B
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
A long-range, high-power electric AWD 5-seater, the EQS 580 4MATIC focuses on premium comfort and road-trip ease. It delivers serious performance and useful cargo space, but it won’t suit budget-first or city-focused buyers.
5 seatsSedanElectric5-star safety523 hpAWDElectric
Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 63 / 57
City 32 / 26
Budget / value 44 / 5
Road trip 69 / 91
Performance 39 / 44
Cargo 29 / 34
Practical 45 / 25
Premium 65 / 76
Winter 70 / 70

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi A6 4.0 TDI · Orange = Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi A6 4.0 TDI Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi A6 4.0 TDI

  • AWD traction for winter and mixed-road confidence on long trips
  • 800 Nm torque and 4.4 s 0–100 km/h for effortless overtakes
  • Efficient for its class at 7 L/100 km, reducing fuel stops
  • Five seats and a 530 L trunk suit growing families and luggage

Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC

  • 770 km claimed range supports long-distance travel.
  • 523 hp and 4.1 s 0–100 km/h enable effortless passing.
  • AWD traction is reassuring in winter conditions.
  • 610 L cargo space and 5 seats work well for family trips.

Verdict

Pick Audi A6 4.0 TDI if…
Lower entry price
Audi A6 4.0 TDI starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC if…
More power
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC puts out 523 hp vs 340 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons