Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro
Suv · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz A 220
Suv · Gasoline
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro
Car A
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro
AWD traction, brisk acceleration, and a 6.2 combined consumption make the Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro well-suited to city and compact-family use. With 5 seats, a 405-liter trunk, and a 35,000 price, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety190 hpAWD
Mercedes-Benz A 220
Car B
Mercedes-Benz A 220
The Mercedes-Benz A 220 is a compact five-seat model that prioritizes efficiency and everyday practicality for small families. With moderate performance and good value in its segment, it suits commuting and city-to-suburb life.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 61 / 69
City 61 / 49
Budget / value 49 / 63
Road trip 45 / 50
Performance 29 / 28
Cargo 30 / 30
Practical 40 / 52
Premium 40 / 45
Winter 70 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro · Orange = Mercedes-Benz A 220

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro Mercedes-Benz A 220
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro

  • All-wheel drive traction for confident commuting in mixed weather
  • Efficient for its class with 6.2 combined consumption
  • Seats 5 with a 405-liter trunk for small-family duties
  • Priced at 35,000, it offers good value in its segment

Mercedes-Benz A 220

  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km combined
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a usable 400 L trunk
  • Balanced output (163 hp, 0–100 km/h in 8.2 s) works well for daily driving
  • Good value in its segment at this price point

Verdict

Pick Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI quattro is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mercedes-Benz A 220 if…
Performance & capability
Mercedes-Benz A 220 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons