Audi RS 3 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

Audi RS 3

Sedan · Gasoline · AWD

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

Sedan · Gasoline · FWD

Car A

Audi RS 3

The Audi RS 3 pairs very high performance (0–100 km/h in 3.8 s, 290 km/h) with all-wheel-drive traction in a five-seat compact. It’s good value in its segment for speed-focused buyers who still need year-round usability, but efficiency and cargo space are clear trade-offs.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safetyAWD

Car B

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

A premium, V8 bi‑turbo performance car that pairs explosive pace with five-seat practicality and a sizable 485 L trunk. Best for buyers prioritizing speed and road‑trip usability over city efficiency.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety476 hp

Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 55 / 62

City 41 / 26

Budget / value 47 / 39

Road trip 52 / 62

Performance 44 / 40

Cargo 15 / 27

Practical 34 / 39

Premium 56 / 67

Winter 66 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi RS 3 · Orange = Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi RS 3 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi RS 3

Serious pace: 400 hp, 480 Nm, 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s.
AWD traction supports confident winter and wet-weather driving.
Seats five, making it viable as a family compact.
Good value in its segment for the performance on offer.
Small trunk (282 L) limits cargo for trips or strollers.
Combined consumption of 10.5 L/100 km is thirsty for daily commuting.
Higher price than non-performance compacts.
No hybrid or EV option for improved efficiency.

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

V8 bi‑turbo power (476 hp, 650 Nm) and 0–100 km/h in 3.4 s for effortless overtakes
280 km/h top speed for serious performance headroom
Five seats and a 485 L trunk suit growing families and road trips
Strong safety ranking signal supports confident long‑distance use
10.5 L/100 km combined consumption is not efficient for city commuting
Front‑wheel drive may limit traction versus AWD options in tough conditions
Cargo flexibility trails SUVs and wagons
Premium $75,000 pricing won’t fit value‑first budgets

Verdict

Pick Audi RS 3 if…

Lower entry price

Audi RS 3 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.

Pick Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 if…

More power

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 puts out 476 hp vs 400 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Audi RS 3

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

Verdict

Related comparisons