Audi TT (Mk3) vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Audi TT (Mk3)

Coupe · Gasoline · AWD

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Coupe · Gasoline

Car A

Audi TT (Mk3)

A compact two-seat performance car with AWD, the Audi TT (Mk3) delivers quick acceleration and useful year‑round traction while remaining efficient for its class. Limited seating and cargo make it better for city use and weekend trips than family duty.

2 seatsCoupeGasoline5-star safety6.8 L/100kmAWD

Car B

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT pairs premium comfort with serious performance, highlighted by 0–100 km/h in 3.6 s and a 318 km/h top speed. It shines on long road trips and performance drives, while two seats and higher fuel use limit daily versatility.

2 seatsCoupeGasoline5-star safety476 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 34 / 37

City 53 / 12

Budget / value 58 / 28

Road trip 34 / 51

Performance 43 / 50

Cargo 9 / 11

Practical 26 / 23

Premium 43 / 82

Winter 60 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi TT (Mk3) · Orange = Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi TT (Mk3) Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi TT (Mk3)

Engaging performance with 245 hp and 0–100 km/h in 5.3 s
All-wheel drive traction adds confidence in wet or winter conditions
Efficient for its class at 6.8 L/100 km
Easy to maneuver and park in the city
Two seats only; not suitable for family use
305 L trunk limits cargo and road-trip flexibility
Petrol-only powertrain with no hybrid or EV option
Less practical for frequent cargo-heavy routines

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Serious straight-line pace (0–100 km/h in 3.6 s, 318 km/h top speed).
Premium comfort aligns well with long-distance touring.
350 L trunk makes weekend luggage manageable for a two-seater.
Ranks strongly for safety in our assessments.
Only two seats; not suitable for family duties.
11.2 L/100 km combined consumption is not efficient for daily commuting.
Limited cargo flexibility versus larger body styles.
Not ideal for stop-and-go city driving.

Verdict

Pick Audi TT (Mk3) if…

Best fuel economy

Audi TT (Mk3) uses 6.8 L/100km vs 11.2 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Mercedes-Benz AMG GT if…

More power

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT puts out 476 hp vs 245 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Audi TT (Mk3)

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

Verdict

Related comparisons