Audi TT S Roadster
Convertible · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz SL 300
Convertible · Gasoline
Audi TT S Roadster
Car A
Audi TT S Roadster
A two-seat AWD roadster aimed at city and performance driving, the Audi TT S Roadster blends 306 hp pace with open‑top appeal. Strong acceleration and a usable 280 L trunk make it a capable choice for two-person commutes and weekend trips.
2 seatsConvertibleGasoline5-star safety7.4 L/100km306 hpAWD
Mercedes-Benz SL 300
Car B
Mercedes-Benz SL 300
The Mercedes-Benz SL 300 is a two-seat luxury performer that pairs an inline-six with solid acceleration and long-distance ease. Strong on comfort and pace, but its high price, fuel use, and limited practicality narrow its appeal.
2 seatsConvertibleGasoline
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssecondary usage match

Usage fit

Family 33 / 3
City 50 / 11
Budget / value 50 / 8
Road trip 33 / 35
Performance 43 / 37
Cargo 7 / 4
Practical 24 / 6
Premium 49 / 66
Winter 60 / 18

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi TT S Roadster · Orange = Mercedes-Benz SL 300

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi TT S Roadster Mercedes-Benz SL 300
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi TT S Roadster

  • 306 hp and 4.9 s 0–100 km/h deliver engaging performance
  • AWD traction aids confidence in winter and wet conditions
  • Two-seat roadster layout prioritizes driver focus and open‑air driving
  • 7.4 L/100 km combined is efficient for its class

Mercedes-Benz SL 300

  • Two-seat layout prioritizes comfort for driver and passenger
  • Inline-six with 215 hp delivers relaxed, responsive power
  • 0–100 km/h in 6.9 s and 250 km/h top speed support confident passing and cruising
  • 225 L trunk makes weekend road trips workable for two

Verdict

Pick Audi TT S Roadster if…
Best fuel economy
Audi TT S Roadster uses 7.4 L/100km vs 12.0 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz SL 300 if…
Performance & capability
Mercedes-Benz SL 300 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons