Ford Fusion AWD vs Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Ford Fusion AWD

Sedan · Gasoline · AWD

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Sedan · Gasoline · FWD

Car A

Ford Fusion AWD

The Ford Fusion AWD blends all-weather traction, strong power, and five-seat practicality for road trips and family duty. It’s good value in its segment, though fuel economy and cargo flexibility won’t suit everyone.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety8.4 L/100kmAWD

Car B

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

The Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63 blends extreme performance with five-seat practicality and a generous trunk, making it a compelling luxury option for road trips and family use. Its 107,000 price and 10.1 L/100 km consumption are harder to justify for city or budget-focused buyers.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety612 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 53 / 64

City 50 / 22

Budget / value 48 / 28

Road trip 57 / 66

Performance 39 / 48

Cargo 26 / 30

Practical 30 / 41

Premium 25 / 78

Winter 66 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Fusion AWD · Orange = Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Fusion AWD Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Fusion AWD

AWD traction for winter and variable conditions on road trips
245 hp and 7.5 s 0–100 km/h provide confident passing and merging
473 L trunk and five seats suit growing-family travel needs
Priced at 28,000, it’s good value in its segment
8.4 L/100 km combined consumption may not satisfy efficiency-focused commuters
473 L trunk limits cargo-heavy use versus larger vehicles
Seats only five with no third-row option
Not aimed at premium seekers per signals

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Exceptional acceleration and speed (3.4 s 0–100 km/h, 300 km/h top speed)
Five seats and a 540 L trunk support family gear and long journeys
Luxury focus makes it comfortable for extended highway travel
Strong safety standing within its class
High purchase price at 107,000
Higher fuel use than regular sedans (10.1 L/100 km combined)
Less suited to stop‑go city driving
Front‑wheel‑drive layout may not appeal to drivers seeking all‑weather traction

Verdict

Pick Ford Fusion AWD if…

Best fuel economy

Ford Fusion AWD uses 8.4 L/100km vs 10.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63 if…

More power

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63 puts out 612 hp vs 245 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Ford Fusion AWD

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Verdict

Related comparisons