Ford Mondeo ST vs Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Ford Mondeo ST

Sedan · Gasoline · FWD

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Sedan · Gasoline · FWD

Car A

Ford Mondeo ST

The Ford Mondeo ST blends punchy petrol performance with five-seat, 525-liter practicality for growing families and road trips. It offers good value in its segment with brisk acceleration and efficient-for-class consumption.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety8 L/100km

Car B

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

The Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63 blends extreme performance with five-seat practicality and a generous trunk, making it a compelling luxury option for road trips and family use. Its 107,000 price and 10.1 L/100 km consumption are harder to justify for city or budget-focused buyers.

5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety612 hp

Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 63 / 64

City 37 / 22

Budget / value 60 / 28

Road trip 62 / 66

Performance 31 / 48

Cargo 29 / 30

Practical 43 / 41

Premium 32 / 78

Winter 30 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Mondeo ST · Orange = Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Mondeo ST Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Mondeo ST

Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.5 s for confident passing
Large 525 L trunk supports family travel
Strong safety standing in its class per rankings
Good value in its segment at this price point
Not ideal for cargo-heavy use despite the generous trunk
FWD layout may disappoint if you face frequent winter driving
Petrol at 8 L/100 km won’t satisfy the most efficiency-focused buyers
Seats five only; not suited to those needing more capacity

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Exceptional acceleration and speed (3.4 s 0–100 km/h, 300 km/h top speed)
Five seats and a 540 L trunk support family gear and long journeys
Luxury focus makes it comfortable for extended highway travel
Strong safety standing within its class
High purchase price at 107,000
Higher fuel use than regular sedans (10.1 L/100 km combined)
Less suited to stop‑go city driving
Front‑wheel‑drive layout may not appeal to drivers seeking all‑weather traction

Verdict

Pick Ford Mondeo ST if…

Best fuel economy

Ford Mondeo ST uses 8.0 L/100km vs 10.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63 if…

More power

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63 puts out 612 hp vs 200 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Ford Mondeo ST

Mercedes-Benz AMG E 63

Verdict

Related comparisons