Mercedes-Benz C 200
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Mercedes-Benz C 200
Car A
Mercedes-Benz C 200
The Mercedes-Benz C 200 leans on reliability, safety, and efficiency to fit family and city driving needs. It offers good value in its segment without chasing performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km156 hp
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Car B
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
The Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring balances strong safety and reliability with city-friendly efficiency at a price that offers good value in its segment. Its compact practicality favors everyday urban use over cargo-heavy or high-performance needs.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 69 / 65
City 53 / 67
Budget / value 61 / 70
Road trip 53 / 36
Performance 24 / 26
Cargo 30 / 21
Practical 53 / 50
Premium 48 / 16
Winter 34 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz C 200 · Orange = Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz C 200 Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz C 200

  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km, easing day-to-day fuel costs.
  • Reliability and safety take priority, aligning with family-first buying.
  • Brisk everyday pace with 0–100 km/h in 6.2 s for confident overtakes.
  • Five seats and a 425 L trunk cover typical errands and school runs.

Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring

  • 5-star safety rating
  • Reliability score of 85
  • Efficient for its class (6.8 combined)
  • Well-suited to city driving and compact-family use

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz C 200 if…
Best fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz C 200 uses 6.0 L/100km vs 6.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring if…
Performance & capability
Mazda CX-3 Grand Touring is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons