Mercedes-Benz C 200
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-30
Crossover · Gasoline
Mercedes-Benz C 200
Car A
Mercedes-Benz C 200
The Mercedes-Benz C 200 leans on reliability, safety, and efficiency to fit family and city driving needs. It offers good value in its segment without chasing performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km
Mazda CX-30
Car B
Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 delivers good value in its segment by balancing efficiency, usable performance, and top safety. It suits compact-family and city use, backed by a reliability score of 85 and five safety stars.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety186 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 69 / 71
City 53 / 56
Budget / value 61 / 72
Road trip 53 / 50
Performance 24 / 28
Cargo 30 / 31
Practical 53 / 54
Premium 48 / 22
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz C 200 · Orange = Mazda CX-30

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz C 200 Mazda CX-30
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz C 200

  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km, easing day-to-day fuel costs.
  • Reliability and safety take priority, aligning with family-first buying.
  • Brisk everyday pace with 0–100 km/h in 6.2 s for confident overtakes.
  • Five seats and a 425 L trunk cover typical errands and school runs.

Mazda CX-30

  • Five-star safety and an 85 reliability score for peace of mind
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 combined consumption
  • Lively daily performance: 186 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s
  • Practical compact-family fit with 430 L trunk and 5 seats

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz C 200 if…
Best fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz C 200 uses 6.0 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-30 if…
More power
Mazda CX-30 puts out 186 hp vs 156 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons