Mercedes-Benz E 450
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-5 Signature
Suv · Gasoline
Mercedes-Benz E 450
Car A
Mercedes-Benz E 450
With 5 seats, a 500 L trunk, and strong V8 torque, the Mercedes-Benz E 450 suits growing families who want confident highway performance. It’s quick (0–100 km/h in 4.6 s), but its 10.2 L/100 km consumption and premium price make city use less compelling.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety300 hp
Mazda CX-5 Signature
Car B
Mazda CX-5 Signature
The Mazda CX-5 Signature balances family practicality with reassuring safety and reliability. Strong cargo space and measured performance make it good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety8.5 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 74 / 87
City 23 / 45
Budget / value 41 / 61
Road trip 64 / 63
Performance 28 / 29
Cargo 36 / 57
Practical 51 / 63
Premium 64 / 26
Winter 40 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz E 450 · Orange = Mazda CX-5 Signature

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz E 450 Mazda CX-5 Signature
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz E 450

  • Five-seat practicality and a 500 L trunk suit growing families and road trips.
  • Effortless overtakes from quick 0–100 km/h in 4.6 s and strong 600 Nm torque.
  • Emphasis on reliability and safety aligns with family priorities.
  • Confident motorway travel thanks to strong torque and high top-speed headroom.

Mazda CX-5 Signature

  • 5-star safety rating for family peace of mind
  • Reliability score of 82 supports low-hassle ownership
  • 875 L cargo and seating for five suit growing families and road trips
  • Efficient for its class with 8.5 combined consumption

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz E 450 if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Mercedes-Benz E 450 is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mazda CX-5 Signature if…
Performance & capability
Mazda CX-5 Signature is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons