Mazda CX-60 2.5 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC 200

Mazda CX-60 2.5

Suv · Gasoline

Mercedes-Benz GLC 200

Suv · Gasoline

Car A

Mazda CX-60 2.5

The Mazda CX-60 2.5 is an efficient-for-its-class, family-focused SUV that pairs a combined consumption of 7 with a 5-star safety rating and a useful 570-liter trunk. With 194 hp and 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s, it offers balanced everyday performance at good value in its segment.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety7 L/100km

Car B

Mercedes-Benz GLC 200

A balanced 5-seat petrol model for growing families and road trips, offering good value in its segment. It emphasizes reliability and safety over track-ready performance or winter specialization.

5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety204 hp

Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 66 / 75

City 46 / 46

Budget / value 43 / 60

Road trip 58 / 57

Performance 29 / 27

Cargo 40 / 38

Practical 43 / 56

Premium 28 / 48

Winter 36 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 2.5 · Orange = Mercedes-Benz GLC 200

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 2.5 Mercedes-Benz GLC 200

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5

Efficient for its class (combined consumption 7).
5-star safety rating.
570-liter trunk suits growing families and road trips.
Good value in its segment at 43,000.
Not aimed at performance driving; 0–100 km/h in 8.5 s is modest for enthusiasts.
Less focused on premium-luxury positioning.
Seats 5 only; no extra-row flexibility for larger families.
Petrol powertrain won’t suit buyers chasing ultra-low fuel bills.

Mercedes-Benz GLC 200

Roomy 5-seat layout and a 550 L trunk suit growing families and luggage-heavy trips
Efficient for its class at 7.2 l/100 km to help manage running costs
Smooth, usable performance (204 hp, 300 Nm, 0-100 km/h in 6.2 s) for daily driving
Aligns with buyers prioritizing reliability and safety in this segment
Petrol powertrain won’t suit shoppers seeking hybrid or electric options
Not aimed at performance driving, despite respectable acceleration
Only five seats, so no third row for larger households
Better choices exist for harsh winter conditions or frequent snow driving

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 2.5 if…

Best fuel economy

Mazda CX-60 2.5 uses 7.0 L/100km vs 7.2 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 if…

More power

Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 puts out 204 hp vs 194 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 2.5

Mercedes-Benz GLC 200

Verdict

Related comparisons