Mercedes-Benz E 200
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD
Suv · Gasoline · AWD
Mercedes-Benz E 200
Car A
Mercedes-Benz E 200
The Mercedes-Benz E 200 suits growing families and road trips, with signals emphasizing reliability and safety. Strong 540 L cargo capacity and efficient-for-class fuel use help it deliver good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km
Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD
Car B
Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD
The Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD delivers efficient-for-its-class running, strong safety, and family-ready space with all-weather traction. It’s a good value in its segment for growing families and road trips, provided you’re not chasing a premium badge or sports-car pace.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety200 hpAWD
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 75 / 66
City 34 / 46
Budget / value 58 / 42
Road trip 65 / 63
Performance 27 / 36
Cargo 38 / 40
Practical 56 / 43
Premium 56 / 28
Winter 40 / 76

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz E 200 · Orange = Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz E 200 Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz E 200

  • Seating for five and a 540 L trunk suit growing families and luggage-heavy trips
  • Combined 6.5 L/100 km consumption is efficient for its class
  • Signals favor reliability and safety for daily duty
  • Priced to offer good value in its segment

Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD

  • Efficient for its class (7.1 combined consumption)
  • 5-star safety rating for added peace of mind
  • AWD traction for confident year-round driving
  • 570 L trunk and five seats suit family and road-trip use

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz E 200 if…
Best fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz E 200 uses 6.5 L/100km vs 7.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD if…
All-wheel drive
Mazda CX-60 2.5 AWD's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons