Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD
Suv · Diesel · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz C 250d
Suv · Diesel
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD
Car A
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD
The Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD suits long trips and growing families by mixing efficient-for-its-class consumption (combined 6), strong 600 Nm torque, and a 570-liter trunk. If you value AWD confidence and highway ease over city-focused manners, it offers good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvDiesel272 hpAWD
Mercedes-Benz C 250d
Car B
Mercedes-Benz C 250d
The C 250d focuses on efficient, torque-rich diesel motoring with space for five and a usable 480 L trunk, suiting growing families and road trips. It prioritizes economy and everyday practicality over outright performance or cargo-heavy duties.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety4.2 L/100km
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 46 / 63
City 36 / 50
Budget / value 44 / 45
Road trip 56 / 52
Performance 38 / 29
Cargo 40 / 34
Practical 44 / 44
Premium 28 / 49
Winter 68 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD · Orange = Mercedes-Benz C 250d

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD Mercedes-Benz C 250d
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD

  • Efficient for its class with a combined consumption of 6
  • Large 570-liter trunk fits family gear with ease
  • Strong 600 Nm torque and 272 hp for confident overtakes
  • AWD traction adds assurance in varied weather and road conditions

Mercedes-Benz C 250d

  • Efficient for its class at 4.2 L/100 km combined
  • Ranks well for safety within its segment
  • Five seats and a 480 L trunk cover everyday family needs
  • 194 hp and 400 Nm support easy highway merging and overtakes

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD if…
Lower entry price
Mazda CX-60 3.3 D AWD starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mercedes-Benz C 250d if…
Performance & capability
Mercedes-Benz C 250d is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons