Mercedes-Benz E 250d vs Mazda CX-60 Diesel — full comparison

Mercedes-Benz E 250d

Suv · Diesel

vs

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Suv · Diesel

Mercedes-Benz E 250d

Car A

Mercedes-Benz E 250d

A diesel Mercedes-Benz with strong efficiency and a very usable 540 L trunk, the E 250d suits growing families and long-distance drivers. It prioritizes economy and practicality over city convenience or performance thrills.

5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety5 L/100km

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Car B

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

The Mazda CX-60 Diesel blends efficient-for-its-class running costs with strong torque and generous cargo space, making it a solid fit for growing families. It favors everyday practicality over premium flash or outright sportiness.

5 seatsSuvDiesel200 hp

Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 74 / 46

City 36 / 45

Budget / value 56 / 41

Road trip 65 / 35

Performance 27 / 28

Cargo 38 / 40

Practical 57 / 42

Premium 57 / 20

Winter 40 / 24

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz E 250d · Orange = Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz E 250d Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz E 250d

Efficient for its class at 5 L/100 km, ideal for long commutes and road trips
540 L trunk and five seats accommodate family gear and passengers
400 Nm torque and 6.6 s 0–100 km/h enable confident overtakes
Good value in its segment considering space, efficiency, and pace at this price
Diesel powertrain is not the best match for mostly short, urban trips
If you want a performance-focused drive, quicker and sharper rivals exist
The listed price of 55,000 may stretch cost-first shoppers
No electrified driving here; this model is diesel-only

Mazda CX-60 Diesel

Efficient for its class at 7.5 L/100 km, especially on longer drives
Large 570 L trunk and five seats suit family gear and daily errands
Strong 450 Nm torque for relaxed driving when fully loaded
Good value in its segment given its space and 200 hp performance
Diesel may be less efficient on short, stop‑start city trips
Those seeking premium-badge appeal may prefer established luxury rivals
Capable but not aimed at enthusiasts who want very quick acceleration
Safety and reliability ratings are not provided here, so verify independently

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz E 250d if…

Best fuel economy

Mercedes-Benz E 250d uses 5.0 L/100km vs 7.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Mazda CX-60 Diesel if…

More power

Mazda CX-60 Diesel puts out 200 hp vs 194 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons