Mercedes-Benz CLA 180
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Suv · Phev
Mercedes-Benz CLA 180
Car A
Mercedes-Benz CLA 180
The Mercedes-Benz CLA 180 suits buyers prioritizing efficiency and sensible family-compact usability over performance. It offers good value in its segment with low fuel consumption and strong safety and reliability signals.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Car B
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
The Mazda CX-60 PHEV blends efficient-for-its-class running costs with strong performance and five-star safety, making it a solid fit for growing families. With a 570 L trunk and a 0–100 km/h time of 5.8 s, it delivers good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvPhev5-star safety1.5 L/100km327 hpPlug-in hybrid
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 69 / 66
City 50 / 53
Budget / value 65 / 51
Road trip 50 / 54
Performance 28 / 28
Cargo 28 / 40
Practical 53 / 48
Premium 45 / 30
Winter 36 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz CLA 180 · Orange = Mazda CX-60 PHEV

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz CLA 180 Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz CLA 180

  • Efficient for its class at 5.5 L/100 km
  • Good value in its segment at an indicated 35,000 price point
  • Five seats suit small-family and daily-use needs
  • Safety and reliability rank strongly in our signals

Mazda CX-60 PHEV

  • Efficient for its class (1.5 combined) to keep running costs low
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.8 s for confident merging and overtakes
  • 570 L cargo space and five seats for family flexibility
  • Five-star safety rating adds reassurance

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz CLA 180 if…
Lower entry price
Mercedes-Benz CLA 180 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mazda CX-60 PHEV if…
More power
Mazda CX-60 PHEV puts out 327 hp vs 136 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons