Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d
Suv · Diesel
vs
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Suv · Phev
Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d
Car A
Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d
The Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d prioritizes efficiency and everyday practicality, with 4.5 L/100 km consumption and space for a small family. It suits city use and longer trips, but isn’t aimed at performance or cargo-heavy duties.
5 seatsSuvDiesel5-star safety
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Car B
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
The Mazda CX-60 PHEV blends efficient-for-its-class running costs with strong performance and five-star safety, making it a solid fit for growing families. With a 570 L trunk and a 0–100 km/h time of 5.8 s, it delivers good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvPhev5-star safety1.5 L/100km327 hpPlug-in hybrid
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 62 / 66
City 52 / 53
Budget / value 50 / 51
Road trip 51 / 54
Performance 27 / 28
Cargo 32 / 40
Practical 43 / 48
Premium 45 / 30
Winter 36 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d · Orange = Mazda CX-60 PHEV

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d

  • Efficient for its class at 4.5 L/100 km
  • Five seats and a 435 L boot cover typical family-compact needs
  • Balanced performance (150 hp, 0-100 km/h in 8.7 s) for daily driving
  • Good value in its segment around 37,000 if efficiency is a priority

Mazda CX-60 PHEV

  • Efficient for its class (1.5 combined) to keep running costs low
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.8 s for confident merging and overtakes
  • 570 L cargo space and five seats for family flexibility
  • Five-star safety rating adds reassurance

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d if…
Lower entry price
Mercedes-Benz GLA 200d starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mazda CX-60 PHEV if…
More power
Mazda CX-60 PHEV puts out 327 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons