Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC
Suv · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Suv · Phev
Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC
Car A
Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC
The GLA 250 4MATIC is an efficient AWD compact that blends family practicality with brisk acceleration. If you want space for five, a usable 435 L trunk, and good value in its segment, it’s a well-rounded pick.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safetyAWD
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Car B
Mazda CX-60 PHEV
The Mazda CX-60 PHEV blends efficient-for-its-class running costs with strong performance and five-star safety, making it a solid fit for growing families. With a 570 L trunk and a 0–100 km/h time of 5.8 s, it delivers good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvPhev5-star safety1.5 L/100km327 hpPlug-in hybrid
Why compared better on fuelcomparison picksame body typesame seatsstep-up price

Usage fit

Family 70 / 66
City 48 / 53
Budget / value 61 / 51
Road trip 56 / 54
Performance 32 / 28
Cargo 32 / 40
Practical 52 / 48
Premium 47 / 30
Winter 76 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC · Orange = Mazda CX-60 PHEV

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC Mazda CX-60 PHEV
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC

  • Efficient for its class with a strong consumption ranking
  • AWD confidence for winter and road trips
  • Brisk 0-100 km/h in 6.9 s for easy passing and merging
  • Five seats and a 435 L trunk fit family-compact duties

Mazda CX-60 PHEV

  • Efficient for its class (1.5 combined) to keep running costs low
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.8 s for confident merging and overtakes
  • 570 L cargo space and five seats for family flexibility
  • Five-star safety rating adds reassurance

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC if…
Lower entry price
Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 4MATIC starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mazda CX-60 PHEV if…
More power
Mazda CX-60 PHEV puts out 327 hp vs 224 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons