Mazda CX-70
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG
Crossover · Gasoline
Mazda CX-70
Car A
Mazda CX-70
The Mazda CX-70 blends brisk performance with generous cargo space, making it well-suited to families that haul. It’s good value in its segment with efficiency that’s reasonable for its class.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline8.5 L/100km
Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG
Car B
Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG
The Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG blends strong power with compact 5-seat practicality, making it a capable family compact with weekend pace. It offers good value in its segment for this level of performance.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety306 hp
Why compared more powercomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seats

Usage fit

Family 54 / 60
City 32 / 48
Budget / value 45 / 39
Road trip 25 / 50
Performance 27 / 29
Cargo 56 / 31
Practical 47 / 37
Premium 9 / 51
Winter 8 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda CX-70 · Orange = Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda CX-70 Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda CX-70

  • Huge 870 L cargo area for bulkier loads
  • Strong 250 hp and 420 Nm for confident pulling
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 6.5 s for easy merging
  • Good value in its segment around 35,000

Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG

  • 306 hp and 5.1 s 0–100 km/h enable confident passing and highway merges.
  • Five seats and a 435-liter trunk suit daily family use and road trips.
  • Signals strong safety standing within its segment.
  • Price of 47,000 represents good value in its performance set.

Verdict

Pick Mazda CX-70 if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda CX-70 uses 8.5 L/100km vs 8.8 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG if…
More power
Mercedes-Benz GLA 35 AMG puts out 306 hp vs 250 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons