Mazda MX-30 PHEV
Crossover · Electric · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz B 180 d
Crossover · Diesel
Mazda MX-30 PHEV
Car A
Mazda MX-30 PHEV
A city-focused plug-in with AWD, the Mazda MX-30 PHEV delivers efficient-for-its-class running and everyday usability at a good value in its segment. Just note the modest acceleration and missing safety/reliability data.
5 seatsCrossoverElectric1.5 L/100km145 hpAWDElectric
Mercedes-Benz B 180 d
Car B
Mercedes-Benz B 180 d
The Mercedes-Benz B 180 d focuses on everyday family practicality and low fuel use rather than thrills. With five seats, a 450-liter boot, and an efficient diesel (4 L/100 km), it suits growing families and city driving.
5 seatsCrossoverDiesel5-star safety
Why compared better on fuelcomparison pickalternative pickcross branddifferent powertrainsame body type

Usage fit

Family 37 / 60
City 72 / 59
Budget / value 53 / 54
Road trip 29 / 50
Performance 29 / 23
Cargo 27 / 32
Practical 42 / 43
Premium 16 / 43
Winter 22 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mazda MX-30 PHEV · Orange = Mercedes-Benz B 180 d

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mazda MX-30 PHEV Mercedes-Benz B 180 d
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mazda MX-30 PHEV

  • Very low official combined consumption (1.5) if you charge regularly
  • AWD adds traction for varied road conditions
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 366 L trunk for daily tasks
  • Priced at 33,900, it’s good value in its segment

Mercedes-Benz B 180 d

  • Efficient for its class at 4 L/100 km, reducing fuel costs
  • Five seats and a 450 L boot suit growing families and daily errands
  • Signals a strong safety standing within its class
  • Good value in its segment at around 30,000

Verdict

Pick Mazda MX-30 PHEV if…
Best fuel economy
Mazda MX-30 PHEV uses 1.5 L/100km vs 4.0 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz B 180 d if…
Performance & capability
Mercedes-Benz B 180 d is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons