Mercedes-Benz B 200
Suv · Gasoline
vs
Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC
Suv · Gasoline · AWD
Mercedes-Benz B 200
Car A
Mercedes-Benz B 200
The Mercedes-Benz B 200 suits growing families who want space, dependability, and calm commuting rather than thrills. It pairs a generous 580 L trunk and efficient 6.5 L/100 km economy with good value in its segment.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km
Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC
Car B
Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC
The GLC 200 4MATIC balances family practicality and AWD assurance with brisk 0–100 km/h pace, delivering good value in the premium SUV segment. If you need seven seats, maximum cargo space, or ultra-low fuel use, consider alternatives.
5 seatsSuvGasoline5-star safety197 hpAWD
Why compared same body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 76 / 65
City 46 / 43
Budget / value 58 / 40
Road trip 55 / 62
Performance 21 / 30
Cargo 40 / 38
Practical 57 / 41
Premium 49 / 49
Winter 36 / 76

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz B 200 · Orange = Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz B 200 Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz B 200

  • Strong focus on reliability and safety for family use
  • 580 L trunk and five seats handle daily needs and trips
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km
  • Good value in its segment at this price point

Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC

  • AWD traction boosts confidence in winter and poor weather
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 6.2 s for confident passing and merging
  • Comfortable five-seat layout with a useful 550-liter trunk for family trips
  • Good value in its segment at a price of 46,000

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz B 200 if…
Best fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz B 200 uses 6.5 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC if…
All-wheel drive
Mercedes-Benz GLC 200 4MATIC's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons