Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC
Suv · Electric · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz B 300 e
Suv · Electric · AWD
Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC
Car A
Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC
An electric AWD five-seater with solid power and a 420 km range, the EQC 300 4MATIC suits road trips and city duty alike. Cargo space and outright performance thrills are not its focus.
5 seatsSuvElectric5-star safety292 hpAWDElectric
Mercedes-Benz B 300 e
Car B
Mercedes-Benz B 300 e
A five-seat AWD EV that balances everyday pace with a long 500 km range and usable space for families. Less suited to performance thrills or hauling very bulky loads.
5 seatsSuvElectric5-star safetyAWDElectric
Why compared performance gapsame body typesame brandsame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 60 / 63
City 63 / 65
Budget / value 45 / 49
Road trip 67 / 58
Performance 34 / 22
Cargo 30 / 34
Practical 44 / 46
Premium 53 / 48
Winter 76 / 36

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC · Orange = Mercedes-Benz B 300 e

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC Mercedes-Benz B 300 e
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC

  • AWD traction adds confidence in winter and on varied roads
  • 420 km range from an 80 kWh battery supports longer drives
  • 292 hp and 565 Nm with 6.2 s 0–100 for confident passing
  • Five seats and a 400 L trunk fit small-family needs

Mercedes-Benz B 300 e

  • AWD traction adds confidence in city and mixed-weather driving
  • 500 km range from a 78 kWh battery supports commuting and road trips
  • Brisk acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.8 s) eases merging and passing
  • Five seats and a 480 L trunk suit growing families’ daily needs

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Mercedes-Benz EQC 300 4MATIC is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Mercedes-Benz B 300 e if…
Performance & capability
Mercedes-Benz B 300 e is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons