Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Audi RS 3
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG
Car A
Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG
Blending supercar pace with five-seat luxury, the S 63 AMG is oriented toward premium comfort and long-distance speed. It’s expensive and thirsty, but stands out for top-speed performance and a strong safety ranking.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety612 hp
Audi RS 3
Car B
Audi RS 3
The Audi RS 3 pairs very high performance (0–100 km/h in 3.8 s, 290 km/h) with all-wheel-drive traction in a five-seat compact. It’s good value in its segment for speed-focused buyers who still need year-round usability, but efficiency and cargo space are clear trade-offs.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety10.5 L/100kmAWD
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame ranking profilesame seatsstrong ranking match

Usage fit

Family 62 / 55
City 19 / 41
Budget / value 24 / 47
Road trip 66 / 52
Performance 49 / 44
Cargo 28 / 15
Practical 38 / 34
Premium 89 / 56
Winter 30 / 66

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG · Orange = Audi RS 3

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG Audi RS 3
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG

  • Very quick acceleration (0–100 km/h in 3.5 s) and 300 km/h top speed
  • 612 hp and 900 Nm provide strong passing power
  • Five seats and a 500 L trunk support family road trips
  • Signals a strong safety standing for added confidence

Audi RS 3

  • Serious pace: 400 hp, 480 Nm, 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s.
  • AWD traction supports confident winter and wet-weather driving.
  • Seats five, making it viable as a family compact.
  • Good value in its segment for the performance on offer.

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Mercedes-Benz S 63 AMG is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Audi RS 3 if…
All-wheel drive
Audi RS 3's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons