Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro
Car A
Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro
Combines V8 pace, AWD traction, and a usable five-seat cabin for fast, confident road trips, backed by a strong safety ranking signal. Less compelling for budget-focused or city-first buyers.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety9.2 L/100kmAWD
Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63
Car B
Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63
A premium, V8 bi‑turbo performance car that pairs explosive pace with five-seat practicality and a sizable 485 L trunk. Best for buyers prioritizing speed and road‑trip usability over city efficiency.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety476 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 55 / 62
City 27 / 26
Budget / value 22 / 39
Road trip 70 / 62
Performance 44 / 40
Cargo 30 / 27
Practical 30 / 39
Premium 69 / 67
Winter 70 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro · Orange = Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro

  • 450 hp V8 twin‑turbo and 4.0 s 0–100 km/h enable effortless passing and brisk touring.
  • Quattro AWD provides confident traction for winter and mixed‑weather travel.
  • Five seats and a 535 L trunk suit road trips and growing families.
  • At 9.2 L/100 km combined, it is efficient for its class given the performance.

Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63

  • V8 bi‑turbo power (476 hp, 650 Nm) and 0–100 km/h in 3.4 s for effortless overtakes
  • 280 km/h top speed for serious performance headroom
  • Five seats and a 485 L trunk suit growing families and road trips
  • Strong safety ranking signal supports confident long‑distance use

Verdict

Pick Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro if…
Best fuel economy
Audi S7 4.0 TFSI quattro uses 9.2 L/100km vs 10.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 if…
More power
Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 puts out 476 hp vs 450 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons