Mercedes-Benz CLS 400
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
Sedan · Electric · AWD
Mercedes-Benz CLS 400
Car A
Mercedes-Benz CLS 400
The Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 blends strong V6 performance with space and comfort for long trips, backed by a 520‑liter trunk and five seats. Its premium pricing and FWD layout make it less compelling for cargo-heavy use or harsh-winter regions that favor AWD.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
Car B
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
A long-range, high-power electric AWD 5-seater, the EQS 580 4MATIC focuses on premium comfort and road-trip ease. It delivers serious performance and useful cargo space, but it won’t suit budget-first or city-focused buyers.
5 seatsSedanElectric5-star safety523 hpAWDElectric
Why compared same body typesame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 54 / 57
City 31 / 26
Budget / value 32 / 5
Road trip 63 / 91
Performance 35 / 44
Cargo 29 / 34
Practical 31 / 25
Premium 62 / 76
Winter 30 / 70

Scores out of 100. Blue = Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 · Orange = Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC

Specs side-by-side

Spec Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Mercedes-Benz CLS 400

  • Strong V6 performance makes highway passing easy
  • 520‑liter trunk and five seats support road trips and growing families
  • Efficient for its class at 8.4 L/100 km combined
  • Ranks well for safety in its class

Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC

  • 770 km claimed range supports long-distance travel.
  • 523 hp and 4.1 s 0–100 km/h enable effortless passing.
  • AWD traction is reassuring in winter conditions.
  • 610 L cargo space and 5 seats work well for family trips.

Verdict

Pick Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 if…
Lower entry price
Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC if…
All-wheel drive
Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC's AWD adds real-world confidence in wet, icy, or mixed-weather conditions.

Related comparisons