Audi RS 3
Sedan · Gasoline · AWD
vs
Mercedes-Benz CLS 400
Sedan · Gasoline · FWD
Audi RS 3
Car A
Audi RS 3
The Audi RS 3 pairs very high performance (0–100 km/h in 3.8 s, 290 km/h) with all-wheel-drive traction in a five-seat compact. It’s good value in its segment for speed-focused buyers who still need year-round usability, but efficiency and cargo space are clear trade-offs.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety400 hpAWD
Mercedes-Benz CLS 400
Car B
Mercedes-Benz CLS 400
The Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 blends strong V6 performance with space and comfort for long trips, backed by a 520‑liter trunk and five seats. Its premium pricing and FWD layout make it less compelling for cargo-heavy use or harsh-winter regions that favor AWD.
5 seatsSedanGasoline5-star safety8.4 L/100km
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 55 / 54
City 41 / 31
Budget / value 47 / 32
Road trip 52 / 63
Performance 44 / 35
Cargo 15 / 29
Practical 34 / 31
Premium 56 / 62
Winter 66 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi RS 3 · Orange = Mercedes-Benz CLS 400

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi RS 3 Mercedes-Benz CLS 400
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi RS 3

  • Serious pace: 400 hp, 480 Nm, 0–100 km/h in 3.8 s.
  • AWD traction supports confident winter and wet-weather driving.
  • Seats five, making it viable as a family compact.
  • Good value in its segment for the performance on offer.

Mercedes-Benz CLS 400

  • Strong V6 performance makes highway passing easy
  • 520‑liter trunk and five seats support road trips and growing families
  • Efficient for its class at 8.4 L/100 km combined
  • Ranks well for safety in its class

Verdict

Pick Audi RS 3 if…
Lower entry price
Audi RS 3 starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 if…
Performance & capability
Mercedes-Benz CLS 400 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons